Lay The Best Weekly Review

 

 

This week finished with +7.14 points – With all due respect a profit is a profit regardless of my concerns below… [But please take into account the extra NON qualifying bets they have included in their results]

January

After 3 days is showing a loss of 3.53 points.  Other points to consider the website is still quoting a 75/85% strike rate please see below in BOLD for the last 3 months  plus January to-date results.

This Week – 27th December 2009 – 2nd January 2010

Some more problems have arisen with LTB this week. There were 2 selections (horses) this week claimed by LTB as winning bets but in fact they were in infringement of their own rules. It is clearly stated in their own rules not to back any selection with an SP of over 4.00 now the 2 horses in question were Taunton 15:25 Dec 30th Shakalaboom priced at SP 7.00  and the other was  Newbury 14:05 December 29th Manyriverstocross SP 5.50.

Upon investigation another overpriced horse was found for December Hexham 14:20 December 9th Riguez Dancer SP 5.5 now these horses accounted for 3.80 points as one selection was Double Unit Play or (DUP) so this should have added to the minus total for the month.

As per Ady’s comments, (LTB MEMBER and Respected Blog Reviewer) he was told by LTB that they sent out an e-mail concerning Shakalaboom but he never received this and nor did I. Is there any other members who wish to add to this, to confirm receipt of this email or deny? Also no e-mails were received by me concerning the other horses I clearly have them as no bets, I also noticed they had a darts bet on Jan 1st to lay Lewis at up to 6.0.  As long as it is clearly stated in the tips section I have no problem allowing a selection through above LTB advised rules but again This is an inconsistency in my view to try and gain some points by laying bigger outsiders.

Now another issue arose this week LTB sent out a special bet on December 30th it was in the 13:40 at Taunton Quandor Noire we were told to back this at 20/1 as the price would be going down it was going to be gambled on by connections and the SP could be as low as 5/1 or 6/1 by the off, what happened the SP ended up at 26/1 so what happened to the so called gamble? How did the horse perform terrible it was pulled up, It really does make me wonder where they get their information? 

If I thought last week they were really gambling then this week was even worse there was 36 bets (without the above horses) of these there was 17 DUP and 2 TUP (Triple Unit Plays) and we found ourselves betting Danish and Swedish Ice Hockey, Belgian Football and Spanish Basketball, true they made a profit on the week, more by luck than judgement if you ask me, but it was still not enough to save the month from making a loss.

All Members of Lay The Best can enjoy a free month now and anyone not receiving the free month please comment on this post.
 

Since November 13th 2009

From the Start of our Trial on 13th November – 2nd January the running bank is now at  minus 13.11 points, But as a heads up for next week, the total had a bad start with -6.48 points, so the true reflection is now -19.59 points.

For the month of December the final total is minus 9.28 points – (This constitutes a FREE month service)

• October had 83 Selections with 53 winning bets = 63.86% Strike Rate     
• November had 137 Selections with 81 winning bets = 59.17% Strike Rate    
• December had 127 Selections with 74 winning bets = 58.27% Strike Rate      
• January has had 10 Selections so far with 5 winning bets = 50% Strike Rate

So what has happened since we started the review on November 13th?

We have now reached Day 52 despite some gains our bank stands at minus 19.59 points, if someone had joined the managed account of LTB on December 1st and invested the 300 pounds minimum bank they would have gone bankrupt after only a few weeks, LTB solution change the minimum bank to 600 pounds, what about the punter who went bankrupt? 

On December 1st subscribers received an e-mail saying that the service would be more selective and concentrate on what they know best Horse Racing and be more selective in there bets what was the outcome for December 127 selections of which 92 were Sports Bets (56.33% S/R) and only 35 horse selections (62.89% S/R) even allowing for recent bad weather that hardly constitutes being selective or concentrating on the horses. 

Two e-mails were sent out one in November and the other on December 23rd acknowledging that results had been poor but it was down to bad luck and bad decisions by referees & players, is it no wonder that the blogger’s on this site are fed up with this service. On a more personal level none of the e-mails I received even acknowledged Xmas or the New Year, did anyone receive a seasonal greeting from this service I certainly did not, its only a minor thing but at least it shows they have some consideration for there clients.

Till Next Week.

Betting System Guru