Sports Betting Professor

Very ordinary start to the NBA season. On the verge of giving it away. 3 wins 10 losses.

I hear the NCAA and NFL systems are getting killed right now. I was excited to jump back in with NBA as they kicked butt last year but now not so sure.

Hey guys, I’m new here. Seeing that most of y’all have experience with this system, would you recommend this “Sports Betting Professor” system now or not? Or is “Sports Betting Champ” better?? If anyone here has tried both systems, please let me know your opinion. Thanx!

Any updates on the MLB? I packed in both systems a long time ago, but would be interested to hear how they are going.

Looks like SBP is gearing up to release an “enhanced” NFL system. No doubt this will leave purchases of the original system with something that “isn’t as good” like the MLB…

Interesting, looks like everyone has given upon this already.

Hi Steve many others share your view and personally I have to see 6 – 9 months of proofed results personally to me.

But there is a massive crowd of system junkies that will not do what we do and it is those people I am trying to help here.

Hey guys, I stopped betting on both the MLB V1 & 2 a while back, just wondering for anyone still betting/monitoring the system, are you finding the MLB profitable? I’m actually hoping the V2.0 fails to break even so I can claim my refund, and have kept all the emails to do my own calculations if it’s a close call, and or rich tries to claim otherwise.

Just wondering how its going to date if anyone knows. Thanks in advance for any replies.

Comm Fitz
I have been bitten that many times in the past that if i don’t see at least 1 full years backcheckable results accompanying a system then i will not buy it irrespective of a 3 month review.

Just a personal thing,I have nothing against you or your site.You all do a great job

I agree Steve. But testing for that long is impractical for my reviewers. What I am trying to do here is let people get an insight before they buy and spend their betfair balances on stuff before, when they can get a general feel for the system or service following a review first. It will save people a lot of money i reckon. And my ultimate goal.

And of course I believe 1 month is stupid also even for the goals of mine above. 3 months has to be the minimum.

Hi
For what it’s worth and this is of course my personal opinion.ANY system should be followed or backchecked via results over 1 full year.

3 months is no time at all in which to gauge the long term profitability of a system.

This site is good in that the reviews are done over a 3 month period (most review sites are only one month which is stupid) but even 3 months is way too short and many things can go wrong after this period,Which is obviously what is happening here.

Hi Mike, I appreciate your posts I really do but you post your opinion as if they are fact and a disclaimer should be posted with your posts that this is your opinion of chase systems. Not all chase systems should be painted with the same brush. My personal opinion is that if a chase system has never lost then it should not be labeled. IF it shows serious signs of losing then yes that can be labeled a chase system that does not work. I personally am not favourable of chase systems but my opinion doesnt count, what counts is a proper fair test.

It would seem from users comments this one in particular is not proving to be having a great time “at the moment.” But this is why I would like to cover this tipster for 12 months. Because for over 3 months of the year he never put a foot wrong, which is why this is in the passed section based on that review.

Andrews has been sending me his Results sine he began and although I dont understand them fully here is the stats i can fathom.

MLB is 91 wins and 94 losses, down 0.12 units. Thats over the course of the whole season.

The record for NBA since March 1st (End of our review) is 40 wins and 31 losses on straight bets (56%).

The system in that time is 27 wins and 2 losses (+14 units)

Thanks to andrew for sending me his results since the end of the review.

A revisit is fine, but it will be months from now as you need new seasons to start. The NFL is over and there is one final bet in the NBA tonight. You will have to wait until 2011 to test the NFL, and well into 2011 for the NBA as well.

My comments are not about the NFL and the NBA, although chase systems will not work in the long run (and often the short run). Baseball is losing, and College Basketball was also a loser which was introduced in early 2010.

Horse racing so far has been a disaster- including today’s selections, there have been 137 races with just 15 horses that finished first (10.9%), and 40 horses that placed with an average odds of 7-2. If you had bet $20 each to win and place over the 7 racing days, you are down $1818.00.

Ouch!

Important Notice

It should be noted that SBP passed a 102 day live review back in March. You can see by reading that review that Shaun tested NBA and NFL which made a decent profit. We will revisit a review for SBP in the next months ahead so advice for people contemplating buying now is, read up on the comment section here to make your decision because we do not know independantly how well it has been going since our Live trial.

Results through 6/9:

120 races/6 days

14 win
37 place

% that won race= 11.6%

average odds on winners about 7:2

As of this date, this is clearly a losing system. In fact, if you were betting $20.00 each to win and place, you would be -$1485.00 or -$247.50 a day
over the past six racing days.

i got this system a few weeks ago just before you started testing it which is just my luck and due to one reason or another have only now just started to try it out. as i live in australia i have a lot of trouble with systems due to the time difference and this one is no different. it’s not until you get the e-book that it mentions you have to check on track odds now and again which is out of the question for me. i can only get on betfair for a win and place the night before which is way to early.i was with the s.b.p’s picks for nba,ncaab and mlb but missed half the games for the same reason.it wasn’t travelling to well anyway maybe because i caught the college games, so i got a refund. the picks are not going to well so far by the look of it but let’ see how it goes.

Results through Sunday 6/6:

110 races 14 win 36 place

% that won race: 12.7%
% that placed: 32.7%

At Hollywood Park on Sunday, you did not cash a ticket. Monmouth was a little better, but you still lost money at that track.

So Allen’’s system has had five (5) racing days, and if you were betting $20.00 each to win and place, you are -$1145.00 or -$229.00 per day.

Amazing how the walk-forward results are not profitable while when you visit his site he claims to have discovered the Holy Grail of horse racing.

Hmmmm…………

Results through Saturday 6/5:

90 races 12 win 31 place

% that won race: 13.3%
% that placed: 34.4%

If one is betting $20.00 to win and $20.00 to place, you have risked $3600.00 and your return is $2819.00 for a -$781.00. So over four days of racing, you are averaging a loss of $195.25 per day.

Sample size is still way too small, but from the results I have seen so far, the % of horses that finished first, second or third (playing to show is not part of system) is not big enough to generate a profit. In other words, we don’t have enough horses in the money at high enough odds to produce a profit over the long run.

@ Michael Gibbons

Thanks for clearing that up, I had that totally wrong. 12% SR @ 4/1 is horrible. Would love to see a statistically significant sample and see whether or not it would become a great lay system, hehe.

41% is combined for win and place at about 4-1 odds in the US. I should have stated the stats as the winning % on all bets to win. If we do that, there has only been 5 winning horses out of 41 races (12.1%) and 15 horses that have placed (36.5%). This is not anywhere near profitable, as witnessed by the parameters (bet $20 each to win and place) that would cause you to be down $689.00 so far.

Variance in statistics can cause this “system” to be an early winner or loser that is independent of the efficacy or profitability of the method. In other words, until we get a lot more races, it is hard to draw any conclusion. I have an open mind, but I use hard statistics to analyze any betting system.

@ Michael Gibbons:

You mean 4/1 ON, or 1.25 in decimal? I assume that’s what you mean otherwise backing 4/1 (5.0) shots with a 41% SR would be a licence to print money! It would be no surprise to see a betting system based on very short odds – luckless buyers win most of their bets, and I think that is what most look for – winning frequency rather than the odds needed to win long term.