Neutral Pending Further Review

..
Note From Admin – SUMMARY
.
Comments From Blog Readers
michael wrote:
bvian wrote:
Sorry matey but you are incorrect. there are bots out there that will allow you to select ‘Only If x runs’.
So bloggers you can indeed follow these selections with a bot, although the list of software is short.
If anyone would like to know what bots can do this, please contact admin for my personal email or mobile number and i will happily discuss it with you.
Regards
Ian
Fitzmozza wrote:
bvian wrote:
At this moment GHB is not capable of this. I have emailed Malcolm, who as always, has stated he will add this to the GHB future additions list.
GHB are always improving their bot, and i would imagine this addition will not be long.
There are a few other bots that can though, so if anyone would like to know what they are please contact James.
Ian
Fitzmozza wrote:
Hopefully in a week or so we will have the relevant software inside the quality tools section.
Mike wrote:
You say you are staking £2 a point.
What do you do for a 0.25 point bet when the minimum stake on Betfair is £2
bvian wrote:
You can bet lower than £2 on Betfair, not that they like you doing it mind!!
Ian
noel wrote:
Tim wrote:
However, there is no more risk (as far as price is concerned) by placing the bets at any time – unless you are an expert in knowing whether prices will go up or down. There is a risk re non-runners but relatively small in the overall picture.
Marc wrote:
You probably need to re-visit Day 18……You have it down as 5 winners on the day when I believe it should be 4 winners.
In the 13:10 at Aintree John Forbes was NOT regarded as a selection since its price was above the maximum.
It went on to win at a BetFair SP of 30.4 so it makes quite a big difference.
Fitzmozza wrote:
There was some controversey over this days results but rather than me typing out exatly what Tim said above again please see his comments as that is exactly what i would say.
The Author has expressed that results do even out whichever way you play BSP or live betting so this result which would have gone either way for users is a fair reflection of one persons account.
When we test systems on here we don’t give systems the benefit of the doubt, because essentially anyone reading this review would go on to buy the system from our link and that is not what we are trying to achieve here.
Every system on this blog will get a tough test and never any benefits or help.
michael wrote:
i was one the ones that laid john forbes, my price was 25s 1 minute before the off, i did not think it would go above 30s. it was not until 30secs before the off it started to spike.
until the race was off you would not know what the bsp is. this is becoming a grey area not only bsp but isp as the same happens odds change without you knowing more and more systems tipping services are starting to use this.then you chose do i play in running or not.which opens up another problem of not getting matched.
my guess more layed this winner then did not.
michael wrote:
Regarding the issue of prices that some have emailed about, I understand your individual situations
but to keep the results constant I have to work to Betfair Starting Prices. Sometimes this will mean
a loss is avoided, but my research has shown that they are balanced with the bets I am forced to miss
that would have been winners for the system had they been placed just before the off
Marc wrote:
What alot of people are doing is to simply use the BetFair option to LAY at SP with a maximum SP setting based on the maximum price indicated by the Profit Rocket system.
This was definitely the case for the John Forbes race in question, since it was very noticeable looking at the stats page on BetFair minutes the race was due to start that showed a huge chunk of money waiting to lay John Forbes at SP at the maximum price of 30.0.
michael wrote:
GB Here 1st Dec / 12:40 3m1f Hcap Chs / Russellstown Boy
Lay SP 9.39 20.86
where do you set a maxium price as i cant see it?it only states take s/p it looks like it is done on liabilty.
noel wrote:
regards
noel
michael wrote:
noel wrote:
regards
noel
michael wrote:
noel wrote:
there has also been a lot of no bet days of late with reasons from working on this maths report to not been able to access the pc which is a bit worrying from a subscription service!
michael wrote:
today was a blank day again, i agree what is worrying is if he was confident in the method why keep changing it when a losing run happens?
kevin wrote:
michael wrote:
noel wrote:
Fitzmozza wrote:
I have not been following this review to be very honest and i myself am not sure about what is happening with profit rocket, but what i do kno wis it has shown very promising signs and finishes its review in the passed section. I have no quarms with the Profit Rocket.
.
.
