<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Betting Pro&#8217;s Final Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bettingsystemtruths.com/summary/2010/04/24/betting-pros-final-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bettingsystemtruths.com/summary/2010/04/24/betting-pros-final-review/</link>
	<description>Betting System Reviews, Alerting betting system scams and unbiased reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sgt Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bettingsystemtruths.com/summary/2010/04/24/betting-pros-final-review/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>Sgt Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettingsystemtruths.com/?p=6491#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>Hi Mick 
      Thats a  very good twist if you take it from September last year  to present you would have 92 selections with 85 winners thats a strike rate of 92.59%. As for profit you would have made 2068 points that would be an ROI of 18.5%, so your starting bank of 1000 points  in September 2009  would have grown to 3068 points. These figures are more like it thanks for sharing that with us, and certainly that does make the service good value. Of course for my review i based it on all the selections  and the stats for those.

Regards
Sgt Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mick<br />
      Thats a  very good twist if you take it from September last year  to present you would have 92 selections with 85 winners thats a strike rate of 92.59%. As for profit you would have made 2068 points that would be an ROI of 18.5%, so your starting bank of 1000 points  in September 2009  would have grown to 3068 points. These figures are more like it thanks for sharing that with us, and certainly that does make the service good value. Of course for my review i based it on all the selections  and the stats for those.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Sgt Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalgonMick</title>
		<link>http://www.bettingsystemtruths.com/summary/2010/04/24/betting-pros-final-review/#comment-2462</link>
		<dc:creator>CalgonMick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettingsystemtruths.com/?p=6491#comment-2462</guid>
		<description>I subscribed to Betting Pros a few months ago, as it looked like a decent proposition on paper, with little work at my end, which is always a bonus(!) and the price was right.

I noticed a couple of things in the first month, so slightly changed my strategy and made a big difference to my profit and I am happy to share these...

1) NO Scottish football bets - lots of these were on Celtic and Rangers and a number of them dipped with big stakes going astray

2) NO away bets - again, I noticed a few of the away bets at short odds weren&#039;t performing how they should have been

Since I applied these two rules, the return was pretty good. I worked at half the recommended stake and made around £300 profit, which was pretty good in my book. I agree that the large stake can make you slightly nervous at times, but on the whole, I think the service is pretty good value for the £40 subscription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I subscribed to Betting Pros a few months ago, as it looked like a decent proposition on paper, with little work at my end, which is always a bonus(!) and the price was right.</p>
<p>I noticed a couple of things in the first month, so slightly changed my strategy and made a big difference to my profit and I am happy to share these&#8230;</p>
<p>1) NO Scottish football bets &#8211; lots of these were on Celtic and Rangers and a number of them dipped with big stakes going astray</p>
<p>2) NO away bets &#8211; again, I noticed a few of the away bets at short odds weren&#8217;t performing how they should have been</p>
<p>Since I applied these two rules, the return was pretty good. I worked at half the recommended stake and made around £300 profit, which was pretty good in my book. I agree that the large stake can make you slightly nervous at times, but on the whole, I think the service is pretty good value for the £40 subscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

