Comments on: Favourites Phenomenon Final Review

By: Natalya

Natalya — Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:49:06 +0000

I have been using this system since September 2010. Its true to say that level 3 failed just before I started on 01/08/10. It then failed on 14/12/10 since that date up to and including 25/02/11 it has delivered the bacon each and every day. When I say each and every day I refer to days that qualify. Its a fantastic system and Matt should be congratulated.

By: Darren

Darren — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:02:31 +0000

And no sooner do I post than I get a reply from Matt!

Apparently, the results on the website are for the manual system (ie not using the bot), and although the results are generally the same, sometimes discrepancies occur. I’m guessing in this case, there was a horse that would have been a joint favourite near the start of the process so the race was excluded, meaning one additional race was required to complete the cycle and that gave the winner!

By: Darren

Darren — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:03:35 +0000

Hiya,

Just wanted to double check people’s results on 30th July. I had a losing day (don’t worry I’m not moaning!) however, the FP site shows level 3 as a winning day.

I have emailed Matt the system owner to check this out, but haven’t heard anything back from him. Did anyone else get a winner using default settings on level 3?

Darren

By: Sgt Dave

Sgt Dave — Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:09:00 +0000

Hi J- Man
As far as i am aware it is only for UK tracks as this is where the author has done his reasearch.

Regards
Sgt Dave

By: J-Man

J-Man — Thu, 19 Aug 2010 03:52:39 +0000

Can this be used on American tracks? Thanks for any help.

By: IanF

IanF — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:58:50 +0000

Hi Dave,
It seems that Paul thinks that if you use the available stats to improve your odds you invalidate the system. There is no pleasing some people. But then they are free to run the system any way they want. It is only Mat who has to either run the original (for the logging of results) or modify it and tell us all.

Personally I don’t care if I run a bog standard system or a tweeked one, so long as I get the best possible return out of it. Since I don’t have access to the 10 yrs of data that Mat used and want to run muti-cycle, i have just gone through the Adrian Massey stats looking at consecutive losing sequences and applied logical (not random) tweeks until I got the improvement I sought.

Ian

By: Sgt Dave

Sgt Dave — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:08:36 +0000

Hi Folks
Everyone is entitled to their opinion but i want to quote this from the FP manual:
Pay attention to weather conditions
Arguably the most important factor in the outcome of a horse race is the going (or
ground conditions). Some horses love harder ground, and some love soft.

Today successful with the job done by the 3rd qualifying race, the meetings Brighton Good to Firm, Lingfield All Weather and Worcester Good (Good to Firm in places). In fact a free report has come out from David Renham at Punter Profit giving stats on flat favourites for the last 5.5 years, which also backs up my theory on going, and types of race.
Anyway you pays your money, you take your choice.

Regards
Sgt Dave

By: paul

paul — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:24:57 +0000

Ian,
You obviously dont understand how the stats the system is based on was arrived at .
It dosnt use stats about going,no of runners time of race etc!! so you are badly misguided…the bets and data are based PURELY on whether fav or not.
Paul