The Profit Rocket – Summary

Neutral Pending Further Review

Results of this system after the review quickly became sour and there was a question as to why the method was continiously being changed.

.

[Click Here To Purchase Profit Rocket]

.

.

.

Comments From Blog Readers

michael wrote:

hi just to point out a bot would be no good for this as some races require all selections to run, if one is a non runner then the race is a no bet.

13/11 14:07:16

bvian wrote:

Hi Michael,

Sorry matey but you are incorrect. there are bots out there that will allow you to select ‘Only If x runs’.

So bloggers you can indeed follow these selections with a bot, although the list of software is short.

If anyone would like to know what bots can do this, please contact admin for my personal email or mobile number and i will happily discuss it with you.

Regards

Ian

13/11 16:40:45

Fitzmozza wrote:

Cant Grey Horse Bot do this?

13/11 17:36:26

bvian wrote:

Hi Admin,

At this moment GHB is not capable of this. I have emailed Malcolm, who as always, has stated he will add this to the GHB future additions list.

GHB are always improving their bot, and i would imagine this addition will not be long.

There are a few other bots that can though, so if anyone would like to know what they are please contact James.

Ian

14/11 10:44:10

Fitzmozza wrote:

Thanks Ian.

Hopefully in a week or so we will have the relevant software inside the quality tools section.

14/11 11:35:59

Mike wrote:

Hi

You say you are staking £2 a point.

What do you do for a 0.25 point bet when the minimum stake on Betfair is £2

15/11 19:36:34

bvian wrote:

Hi Mike,

You can bet lower than £2 on Betfair, not that they like you doing it mind!!
Ian

16/11 07:29:18

noel wrote:

hi,any updates on this review? looks promising so far!!

17/11 09:35:27

Tim wrote:

The official system results are based on BSP. In practice a specific number of points (or parts thereof)cannot be staked at BSP – a stake s based on liability.

However, there is no more risk (as far as price is concerned) by placing the bets at any time – unless you are an expert in knowing whether prices will go up or down. There is a risk re non-runners but relatively small in the overall picture.

18/11 08:44:59

Marc wrote:

Hi,

You probably need to re-visit Day 18……You have it down as 5 winners on the day when I believe it should be 4 winners.

In the 13:10 at Aintree John Forbes was NOT regarded as a selection since its price was above the maximum.

It went on to win at a BetFair SP of 30.4 so it makes quite a big difference.

25/11 10:47:01

Fitzmozza wrote:

Hi Marc. Thanks for your valued contribution to the blog…

There was some controversey over this days results but rather than me typing out exatly what Tim said above again please see his comments as that is exactly what i would say.

The Author has expressed that results do even out whichever way you play BSP or live betting so this result which would have gone either way for users is a fair reflection of one persons account.

When we test systems on here we don’t give systems the benefit of the doubt, because essentially anyone reading this review would go on to buy the system from our link and that is not what we are trying to achieve here.

Every system on this blog will get a tough test and never any benefits or help.

25/11 10:56:45

michael wrote:

admin i agree with you it should be counted as a loser.
i was one the ones that laid john forbes, my price was 25s 1 minute before the off, i did not think it would go above 30s. it was not until 30secs before the off it started to spike.
until the race was off you would not know what the bsp is. this is becoming a grey area not only bsp but isp as the same happens odds change without you knowing more and more systems tipping services are starting to use this.then you chose do i play in running or not.which opens up another problem of not getting matched.
my guess more layed this winner then did not.

25/11 11:54:31

michael wrote:

to be fair to this author he/she is looking into a fair way to record results. here is a comment regarding the above on the blog page.

Regarding the issue of prices that some have emailed about, I understand your individual situations
but to keep the results constant I have to work to Betfair Starting Prices. Sometimes this will mean
a loss is avoided, but my research has shown that they are balanced with the bets I am forced to miss
that would have been winners for the system had they been placed just before the off

25/11 11:57:15

Marc wrote:

I do understand that it is difficult to gauge whether the BFSP will be above the maximum price suggested by the Profit Rocket system.

What alot of people are doing is to simply use the BetFair option to LAY at SP with a maximum SP setting based on the maximum price indicated by the Profit Rocket system.

This was definitely the case for the John Forbes race in question, since it was very noticeable looking at the stats page on BetFair minutes the race was due to start that showed a huge chunk of money waiting to lay John Forbes at SP at the maximum price of 30.0.

26/11 00:21:09

michael wrote:

hi mark i tried the brtfair s/p yesyerday om russeltown boy i set a price of 8 for £25 thinking it would lapse if over 8 but they matched it at 9.39 lucky it lost
GB Here 1st Dec / 12:40 3m1f Hcap Chs / Russellstown Boy
Lay SP 9.39 20.86

where do you set a maxium price as i cant see it?it only states take s/p it looks like it is done on liabilty.

02/12 07:42:28

noel wrote:

hi michael, there should be a box that you need to check to specify max odds limit its just above the box for your liability.hope that helps.

regards
noel

03/12 09:47:33

michael wrote:

hi neol thanks for your help,i have found it now, much appericated, its nice to know people on here will give a helping hand if they can.

03/12 14:49:17

noel wrote:

no worries michael!

regards
noel

03/12 17:59:09

michael wrote:

rumour has it the rocket has called in a maths expert to sort out the poor run!

10/12 12:41:19

noel wrote:

has anyone seen this report the rocket was supposed to be compiling with the help of this maths expert to figure out the poor run of late?

there has also been a lot of no bet days of late with reasons from working on this maths report to not been able to access the pc which is a bit worrying from a subscription service!

13/12 11:43:15

michael wrote:

noel all it turn out to be was going from level stakes to the same liabilty on each selection.
today was a blank day again, i agree what is worrying is if he was confident in the method why keep changing it when a losing run happens?

13/12 18:48:25

kevin wrote:

Are you sure that’s all it is Michael. I know he’s changed the staking method but I don’t think anyone has seen the report yet as he said he only put it in the post yesterday.

13/12 19:13:39

michael wrote:

hi kevin sorry my last post might have been misleading, i have not seen or know the content.

13/12 19:41:37

noel wrote:

i agree why be so quick to change it if the service was over 100 points profit in each month of september and october?

13/12 21:37:18

Fitzmozza wrote:

Hi guys i am now closing this section up as the trial has now ended.

I have not been following this review to be very honest and i myself am not sure about what is happening with profit rocket, but what i do kno wis it has shown very promising signs and finishes its review in the passed section. I have no quarms with the Profit Rocket.

13/12 21:50:47

.

.

.

.

.

[Click Here To Purchase Profit Rocket]

.

.

.