Betting Supremacy Review Scam?
Failed Due Dilligence
When I first opened up the site I was stunned to see what looked like a REAL and under hyped video pitch. Very cleverly worded and done to pull on your heart strings.
My Due Diligence started here…
This guy springs out of nowhere, never heard of him before, appears to have no Google history and plants one right on your kisser..
As I have mentioned with the majority of System/Service reviews there is a process that I follow in order to score in the diligence test. I give a score for each of the 12 points below. score out of a minimum of and a maximum of 10 points for each test…
Most often than not I end up with a score lower than 40/120. If your interested in this way of judging a system or service before you buy it, there is 8 rules that any normal buyer on the street can way up and I will be releasing a FREE e-book and video training course detailing how you can make that all important decision before parting with your cash. (More on that in MARCH)
I won’t go into detail with the scoring system now but I have added the mark next to the diligence check mark…
1) Who is check – 0/10
2) Author authenticity – 1/10
3) Sales Pitch – 6/10
4a) Proof – 1/5
4b) Downloadable Results History 0/5
5) Testimonials – Believability? 1/10
6) Who is promoting it? (Any Trusted names?) 1/10
7) Was I contacted about promoting it? 0/10
8.) Cost 3/10
9) Money back guarantee? 8/10
At this point a score of 70+ would be needed for me to even purchase the e-book but as this is my review site I have to invest to give you the full picture…Because I invested in the e-book I am now able to complete part 2 of my diligence test which is points 10,11 and 12.
10) Up sells – 1/10
11) Is the system fully reversible through Adrian Massey? 1/10
12) How in-depth is the manual? 2/10
Total – 25/120
I want to explain a little about each point and how I came to my conclusion.
1)
www.whois.net, When was the name registered?
Is there a postal address and telephone number?
Is the owner of the domain the same name used by the supposed Author?
Name Server: my.privatedns.com
Name Server: your.privatedns.com
Registrant ID: Unknown
Registrant Name: Domains by Proxy, Inc.
Registrant Organization: Unknown
Registrant Street1: Unknown
Registrant Street2: Unknown
Registrant Street3: Unknown
Registrant City: Unknown
Registrant State/Province: Unknown
Registrant Postal Code: Unknown
Registrant Country: Unknown
Registrant Phone: Unknown
Registrant Fax: Unknown
Registrant Email: Unknown
What have they got to hide?
2)
Have I heard of this Author before, Spend 10 minutes on Google, and yahoo search engines. Type in his name using keywords like “scam” “betting system”, “marketer” my scoring is then based on the results of this 10 minutes. No info at all is just as bad as plenty of info, keep that in mind…
3)
Is the sales pitch over hyped? I usually look for American terms used in the sales pitch, massive claims made, you know the usual dross? Leave your JOB tomorrow, buy a Ferrari next week… The list could go on…
4a)
Well 4a and 4b are more or less the same thing but I like to score for both, 4a is basically proof? A video showing Betfair accounts with the statements and also the last how ever many years they are claiming results slowly scrolled through showing race names and types and of course the profit level. Screenshots are useless.. I have caught many wannabe marketers out with screenshot being tampered with.
You only have to go to this website here to check how easy it is for these guys to do it:
4b)
Well Do they offer results to be downloaded? IF they do how extensive are they? Betting Supremacy ZERO results…
5)
Testimonials and believability. Look at the testimonials. In my experience 50% of testimonials do not have perfect grammar and the picture supplied with the testimonial is a big giveaway. Betting Supremacy just take a look at the picture of the bettors they look like professional actors, something taken for a magazine shoot!
6)
Ok so who is promoting it, Like many of you my inbox gets rammed with around 5 – 15 emails every time one of these launches happens. I am not going to put a list up of the usual suspects but in given time you should have a reasonable list of Cowboys.
Also with this you should have a list of the decent marketers. Ones you can trust, These people usually care about your well being. I know these people and can talk with them on a phone or in a pub at any given time or place…
7)
Now this rule is designed for me only it helps because I am fairly well known in the online betting system industry, lets face it if you haven’t heard of James Fitzmaurice the 26 stone beast from Betting System Truths then you will get too know me very quickly especially if you are the author of dodgy crap being sold online…
Have I been contacted to promote the product, If Yes I can do some digging with the Author myself, do I get continued response from them? Or do conversations break down quickly for some strange reason? OR No I haven’t been contacted well that makes me very upset 🙁 Surely they have heard about me by now Why are you giving me such a wide birth? Don’t tread on my toes. Surely getting an approval from my site which gets nigh on 1500 unique visits a day! can influence your sales?
8.)
COST, Does the cost have a good reflection on the amount of profit forecasted?
£47 for a system that will make you 800 points in 2 years.. GET REAL…
9)
Does the product come with a money back guarantee? Yes it does and because its click bank this gets its highest score 8/10.
10)
Up sells, If you decide to buy and there is an immediate up sell which gives you an ad on to the system to make it even better or a totally new system altogether then be very wary and consider applying for a refund straight away. The only up sells I can condone is automation of the rules in a bespoke betting robot.
11)
Having checked through the system rules with Adrian Massey site I can confirm this can be fully back checked right back to 2004. After reading another well respected blog the profit and loss is absolutely terrible from 2004 to know but surprisingly something went right from 2006. +800 points profit but Its the long runs of losses that make it hard to stomach. Over a hundred times the losses stretched over 20 bets without a winner. You would definitely need a very big sized bank even to play at £20 win stakes. I’m talking thousands..
12)
Manual value for money?, The manual devotes only 3 pages to the actual system, very poor in my opinion..
That’s it guys make up your own mind but This failed my Due Diligence test and finds itself in the FAILED section. Any website that doesn’t score 80+ point from 120 goes straight into my failed section
Betting Supremacy = 25/120 – SCAM –
Please Leave Your comments and discussion by clicking HERE
Failed Due Dilligence
